paxltd.blogg.se

The letter may be viewed here:Ĭomparing Virtues of Universal's. Some have claimed no company would have survived this long making only their hybrid carbines.Ībe Seiderman, inventor of the design, authored a letter to customers giving an overview of some of the changes and why they were made. If the hybrid design was flawed to the degree

Of the 420,000+ carbines manufactured by Universal 1962-1984 over 350,000 of them were their hybrid version manufactured 1967-1984. The change did create a number of minor problems This major change has been the cause of much criticism as Universal's hybrid has historically been compared to carbines of the design of the U.S. Made by other manufacturers and the surplus GI parts for the original U.S. While similar in appearance and using the same cartridge the majority of their carbine and it's parts were no longer interchangeable with parts used with their earlier carbines, the replica carbines To a degree the end result should no longer be viewed as a replica of the U.S.30 caliber carbine, Model M1. Universal's solution to these problems was to significantly redesign their carbines.

It's strengths and weaknesses and the original carbine design was no exception. Not specific to Universal Firearms and can be encountered by any company intent on making a functional replica of the U.S. 30 caliber carbines during and after WWII. Commercial manufacturersīegan encountering a number of problems previously encountered by those who had initially designed and redesigned parts for the. Several parts, such as the slide, were difficult to machine correctly.

Universal's Major Design Overhaul - Their M1 Carbine becomes the Universal Firearms CarbineĪs the availability of GI surplus parts dwindled commercial equivalents were manufactured. Post WWII Commercially Manufactured M1 Carbines (U.S.A.)